|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Diablocon - No, the question is; who art thou, ham planks? Shanks! I meant shanks TALK - 15:37, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Edit Conflict: Alright, here's one possible solution to our magic template debate. First off, I used modern names because I was working off my GBA versions of 1-6 because it's easy to start up a DS in front of the PC. Now, while it does list every white magic, bar XI becuase I know jack-all about it, it's a freaking huge template. Then again, only white and black magic would have templates this big, every other type, like Blue and Grey/Time would be much smaller. A possible way to size it down is to make it like the Summon template, by listing reucrring spells at the top, then exclusive spells underneath, which is certainly the best possible solution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|