Talk:Final Fantasy (Series)

From Final Fantasy Wiki

Contents 1 waffle 2 Mixed responses? 3 XIII 4 Final Fantasy XIV announced 5 But wait!

[edit] waffle

There's a whole lot of waffle here that I think could do with removing, as it will end up being put into the articles of their respective games eventually. For example, the details on what each game added to the series. I'm not sure if I should delete it outright or wait until it's integrated elsewhere. --Hob 21:30, 16 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Go ahead, i don't think we need a summary of each game on here either. It definitly needs some cleaning up... --Shane613 15:57, 17 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Umm... I'm not exactly sure how you want to handle this. It seems to have almost everything you wanna know about FFXI.  :/ --Mikru 17:06, 18 Aug 2005 (UTC)

well ours is different, we are covering ALL the Final Fantasy series, they are focusing only on one game... --Shane613 20:48, 18 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Fans don't appreciate it enough. --Auron Kaizer 17:17, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

this wikia focus on 1 player game. We should create 1 article explain about FFXI in general, but we put link into FFXIonline.wikia.com if the reader want to read and have info about them.
and i read some text and realise this page must split into 3 article.. because the content are to long. if you don't mind.. please erase the wikipedia tag there. --User:Landavia 01:34, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

A) We have created 1 article explaining about FFXI in general - we even have articles on its expansion packs. The link you gave was an invalid wikia. B) Without detailing what the 3 article split is, sorry, the article is fine the way it is. C) If anyone can fix what the templates asks to fix, it can be removed. But not without. Bluer 04:03, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mixed responses?

Which aspects of Final Fantasy XII specifically received mixed responses? The game as a whole received a majority of critical acclaim, so I'm not sure what's trying to be said. Chocotard 19:46, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Maester - ...is re-playing FFX TALK - 20:25, 5 May 2008 (UTC) True. Every FF fan i've met places FFXII in they're top three, and rating at it's release mirror this. I think that the writer was trying to fill some gaps while trying to look impressive.

AJDurai - *insert Creepsy laugh here* TALK - What use is {{{time}}} if you're not gonna use it? How true. I sure bet some people here tried to push their views there. >;D Deleted it, because that wasn't a critic section.

[edit] XIII

Ultima - Never go to bed mad. Stay up and fight. Should we put FFXIII on the timeline since it has been announced for 2009? —Tell me why

BlueHighwind Q? TALK - I Am Vengeance. I Am the Knight. I Am Batman! ツ: What is planned and what will be can be two very different things. That's a vague number, "2009". I'm not adding it until I see a definite release date and TV promos and a demo showing that there actually is a game behind all the FMVs.

[edit] Final Fantasy XIV announced

A fourteenth game in the franchise was recently officially announced at E3 at the Sony conference. It's gonna be an MMORPG and will take place in the same word as XI. Kaihedgie 19:38, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Like all but two users are screaming right now. Shit.  ILHI ^(W/B) 19:40, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

I bet the XI fans are happy… ScatheMote 19:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Who said it was in Vana'diel? I read that they only said it was an MMO and didn't spill further details. MasterConjurer 20:07, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Uch, what a terrible day for me and 99.9% of all the editors and visitors to this website. None of us will ever care about this for more than the fact that it holds a title that could be used for a better game. --BlueHighwind ツ 20:13, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] But wait!

This article states that the original Final Fantasy might have been Square's last game if it didn't sell; but Hironobu Sakaguchi's article states that it was just meant to be 'his last game. WarxePB 15:23, November 11, 2009 (UTC)